Title/topic of session Presenter Date of session * Month MonthJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec Day Day12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031 Year Year20222023202420252026 This educational session met its stated objectives: Yes No This educational session was relevant to my clinical practice/training level: Strongly Agree Agree Neither Agree Nor Disagree Disagree Strongly Disagree Explain: What new knowledge have you gained as a result of your participation in this month's case discussions? New method/method improvement Genotype-phenotype correlation Laboratory workflow improvement Disease association/pathway Other: What new knowledge have you gained as a result of your participation in this month's case discussions? Other: Rate the presentation: Poor Fair Good Excellent Content (what was said) Content (what was said) - Poor Content (what was said) - Fair Content (what was said) - Good Content (what was said) - Excellent Delivery (how it was said) Delivery (how it was said) - Poor Delivery (how it was said) - Fair Delivery (how it was said) - Good Delivery (how it was said) - Excellent Please offer feedback to the presenter(s): This educational session contributed to my professional effectiveness related to: Strongly Agree Agree Neither Agree Nor Disagree Disagree Strongly Disagree Working with an interprofessional team Working with an interprofessional team - Strongly Agree Working with an interprofessional team - Agree Working with an interprofessional team - Neither Agree Nor Disagree Working with an interprofessional team - Disagree Working with an interprofessional team - Strongly Disagree Engaging in effective interprofessional communication Engaging in effective interprofessional communication - Strongly Agree Engaging in effective interprofessional communication - Agree Engaging in effective interprofessional communication - Neither Agree Nor Disagree Engaging in effective interprofessional communication - Disagree Engaging in effective interprofessional communication - Strongly Disagree What specific changes will you make in your clinical practice as a result of your participation in this month's case discussions? New method development/method improvement Update clinical result interpretations Laboratory workflow improvements Laboratory staff training Explain how you will share the information provided during the session with your interprofessional team in order to develop a plan to improve patient care: What barriers to interprofessional collaborative practice do you experience in your professional practice? Commercial bias is defined as a personal judgment in favor of a specific proprietary business interest of an entity that produces, markets, sells, or distributes healthcare goods or services consumed by, or used on, patients. It is important that CE activities accredited by the University of Wisconsin - Madison Interprofessional Continuing Education Partnership be free of commercial bias. If you perceived the presence of commercial bias in the educational content or actions of any speaker and/or planner please tell us here: List challenges, problem areas, new treatments, guidelines, drugs, etc. in your practice in which you could benefit from further education: Was this discussion the most effective format in which you learn about the topics represented in these cases? Yes No Would you participate in further education on any of the topics represented in these cases? Yes No Leave this field blank