Submitted by Marianna Shershneva on
Madhavpeddi AR, Walter JL, Wells JR, Jehnet M. From theory to practice: Evaluating the integration of adult learning theory in continuing medical education activities. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2026. PMID: 41452159. DOI: 10.1097/CEH.0000000000000636.
Abstract
The underpinnings of adult learning theory are foundational to continuing medical education (CME). Several widely studied learning theories are relevant to medical providers including deliberate practice, situated learning theory and community of practice, social cognitive theory and self-determination, adaptive expertise, and experiential learning theory. The Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education recognizes 11 types of CME activities each integrating these learning theories to some degree. Provider preferences are shaped by accessibility, cost, flexibility, and opportunities for networking leaving many balancing the convenience of online programs with the value of in-person interactions. The degree to which learning theories are integrated within CME activities is widely understudied despite their interwoven relationship and association to provider preferences. This analysis aims to (1) evaluate the degree various CME models integrate learning theory; (2) identify theory-led strengths and limitations of CME models; and (3) extrapolate themes for CME planners to strengthen theory integration. The three most common types of CME activities are enduring material (ie, web-based courses, web-based courses with simulation), live courses (ie, conferences, webinars, simulations), and regular scheduled series (ie, Project Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes, speaker series). Integration of learning theory across 7 CME models was evaluated through a content analysis using a trichotomous classification system (fully integrated, partially integrated, or no integration). Results varied, with Project Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes and live simulations having the highest degree of theory integration. A thematic analysis identified five themes for improving theory integration including feedback mechanisms, structured self-reflection, adaptability to promote autonomy, repeat exposure to complex skills, and practice of humility.
Questions
- In your experience, is theory integration in continuing education (CE) for healthcare professionals typically intentional or implicit? Is “full integration” of all theoretical elements necessary, or even desirable, for every CE activity?
- The researchers found that webinars had the lowest theory integration among the activity formats they studied. Do you agree with this assessment? What design changes could improve theory integration in webinars?
- This study identified five key themes for improving theory integration in CE: feedback mechanisms, structured self-reflection, adaptability to promote autonomy, repeat exposure to complex skills, and practice of humility. Which of these themes/strategies is most feasible to implement in your education planning and teaching? Why?

Facebook
X
LinkedIn
Forward
Comments
cakorib cakorib replied on Permalink
<!--td {border: 1px solid
In my experience, theory integration in CE is mostly implicit; planners borrow pieces of adult learning principles without mapping them deliberately. I don’t think “full integration” is necessary for every activity, but being explicit about the one or two theories you’re leaning on would make outcomes easier to evaluate. Webinars often end up as passive slide decks, so I agree they can score low unless you build in deliberate practice, polling with feedback, and short reflective prompts. The most feasible theme for me is structured self-reflection, since it’s easy to add a two-minute post-session prompt and follow-up question. Also, I keep seeing irrelevant spam links such as top Aviator casino apps show up in learning portals, which undercuts the sense of community and psychological safety these models depend on.
cakorib cakorib replied on
cakorib cakorib replied on Permalink
<!--td {border: 1px solid
i agree that “full integration” isn’t always the goal; what matters is aligning the activity format with a clear learning intention and then measuring it. webinars can be low on theory integration when they’re lecture-only, but simple changes such as case branching, fast feedback loops, and brief commitment-to-change prompts can raise the bar. in our system we also fight off-topic link drops, and i’ve had to remove https://livedealerindia.com/ and https://live-crazy-time.org/ and https://lightningdicegame.com/ from chat transcripts because they derail discussion and undermine psychological safety. the most feasible theme for my planning is feedback mechanisms, since even short polling plus facilitator debrief can create deliberate practice without adding much time.
cakorib cakorib replied on
Mike Guide replied on Permalink
Millions of players love
Millions of players love Geometry Dash for its fast pace, engaging challenges, and the deeply satisfying sense of victory after completing each level.
Mike Guide replied on
cakorib cakorib replied on Permalink
<!--td {border: 1px solid
<!--td {border: 1px solid #cccccc;}br {mso-data-placement:same-cell;}--> i think theory integration in ce is usually implicit, mostly because planners are constrained by time and platform templates rather than intent. full integration doesn’t feel necessary for every activity; picking one target theory and designing assessments around it is more realistic. i agree webinars tend to score low when they’re monologic, but adding brief case pauses, chat-based peer comparison, and immediate feedback on answers would help. the most feasible strategy for my team is feedback mechanisms, since even a few well-timed polls plus facilitator debrief creates a practice loop. we’ve also had to clean weird off-topic link drops in session chats, including https://oneblackjack.org/ and https://freebetblackjack.net/ which distracts learners and chips away at psychological safety.
cakorib cakorib replied on
Steve Micheal replied on Permalink
CoffeeBliz helps visitors
CoffeeBliz helps visitors explore these flavors while comparing estimated calories, beverage sizes, and customization opportunities. Customers often discover entirely new favorite drinks simply by browsing <!--td {border: 1px solid #cccccc;}br {mso-data-placement:same-cell;}--> trumpet and drum menu pages before visiting a café. Seasonal flavor innovations keep coffee menus exciting because they encourage repeat visits while giving customers opportunities to experience limited-time recipes unavailable during the rest of the year.
Steve Micheal replied on
Axness Axness replied on Permalink
Repeat practice is probably
Repeat practice is probably the hardest thing to build into CE, but it's also what helps the most. One session is rarely enough for more complicated skills. -hypackel
Axness Axness replied on
Filmy Fly replied on Permalink
I completely agree with your
I completely agree with your take on recent Indian movies. I rely on FilmyFly for same day reviews that help me decide whether to watch a film in theatres or wait for OTT.
Filmy Fly replied on
Allison Penton replied on Permalink
This is a fantastic breakdown
This is a fantastic breakdown of how learning theories apply to CME. It really highlights the gap between what we know about learning and how it's actually implemented. I'm especially interested in how this applies to more interactive, game-like learning scenarios, almost like a Pokerogue and Pokerogue Dex for medical education – imagine a randomized, adaptive learning path!
Allison Penton replied on
Stefan MC oni replied on Permalink
I was chatting with a friend
I was chatting with a friend about how some companies manage to stay relevant after nearly a decade, and he mentioned Soft2Bet's ninth anniversary as a great example. Curious, I looked up their story and found an article that really put things in perspective. Founded in 2016 by Uri Poliavich, the company started with a simple idea: to build a flexible, secure, and scalable platform that could adapt to market demands. What stood out to me wasn't just the growth—19 licenses across 11 jurisdictions, a team representing over 30 nationalities—but how they've built a culture that encourages creativity and accountability. Their MEGA gamification platform, launched in 2023, has increased player engagement by 400% and revenue by 65%, and they've also created a €50 million investment fund to support innovation in the space. Living here in the USA region, where the market is still developing, watching a company grow with such discipline and transparency feels like a blueprint for sustainable growth. If you're curious about their journey, you can check out thedigitalworkplace.com/articles/soft2bet-marking-nine-years-of-innovation-leadership-and-sustainability/ — it's a solid look at how to build something that actually lasts.
Stefan MC oni replied on